EPPR Current Projects and Activities
EPPR’s current projects
and activities are summarized below; links to documents are provided as
appropriate:
Completed
projects and activities are described elsewhere on the site.
Cooperation on Spill Response in the Arctic: Gap Analysis
The EPPR Working Group decided to establish a correspondence group to: 1) consider the 2000 Gap Analysis and the need to update it, 2) consider international regimes related to oil and HNS spills in international waters, 3) review the AMSA recommendations and the report from the Envisioning Disasters and Framing Solutions workshop, and 4) propose a way forward at the next meeting.
This group will be led by Norway, with one representative from each country. Please see the Gap Analysis document. For your reference, assessments from 1998 and 1999 are accessible as well.
Emergency
Source Control Management and Spill Prevention Strategies for High Priority
Risks
Region: Russian
Federation
Project Period: 2000 ongoing
Funding: US and Russian Federation
Local Counterparts: Russian Federation: EMERCOM of Russia; IBRAE (Nuclear
Safety Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences); Federal Agency for Atomic
Energy of Russia (formerly MINATOM of Russia). US: Office of International
Emergency Management and Cooperation, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
Brief: The Environmental
Risk Analysis of Arctic Activities (1998) listed various activities, such
as chemical spills, that pose a high risk to the Arctic region. The source
control management and spill prevention strategies projects will reduce these
risks for high-risk facilities and activities through a series of pilot
projects. The projects include the development of an ongoing risk assessment
methodologies document (working draft) and a series of on-site facility risk
assessments at selected hazardous industrial facilities and facilities
handling radioactive and / or nuclear materials. The Phase
I report on source control management and prevention strategies for
chlorine handling at the Apatity waterworks was published in 2002. The Phase
II project, a risk assessment at the Russian Research Institute of Atomic
Reactors (NIIAR) Fuel Research Department in Dimitrovgrad, was completed in
2004. A related series of ISO 14001 (Environmental Management Systems)
training programs were held in the Russian Federation in 2003 and 2004. The
revised ‘working draft’ of the ‘Refined Risk Assessment Methodology’ Report
will be completed in January 2005. The Phase III source control management
pilot project on risk assessment is being undertaken in the Murmansk Region
by the US and the Russian Federation, with participation by Sweden and Finland.
The working draft of the ‘Refined Risk Assessment Methodology’ Report may be
revised based on lessons learned.
Community Radiation Information
Project Kola Region
Region: Kola Region of
the Russian Federation
Project Period: 2002 2004
Funding: US and Russian Federation
Local Counterparts: Russian Federation: EMERCOM of Russia; IBRAE (Nuclear Safety Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences). US: Office of International Emergency Management and Cooperation,
National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
Brief: This project responded to the public need for information about
radiation by developing and distributing a brochure and informational CD. The
focus was on the Murmansk and Arkhangelskaya regions of Russia. The
document
is available on the EPPR web site in English. A second project, an
information booklet to provide radiological response information for
government officials in the Russian Federation, is under development.
Community
Radiation Information on Emergency Exercises
Region: Russian Federation
Project Period: 2002 2004
Funding: US and Russian Federation
Local Counterparts: Russian Federation: IBRAE (Nuclear Safety Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences). US: Office of International Emergency Management and
Cooperation, National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
This brochure and informational CD respond to public/professional need for
information about radiation and emergency-response planning. As part of a Russian Federation
education/training program on emergency preparedness and response, the
document explains the rationale, logistics and results-integration of
emergency exercises. Available on the EPPR website, the document
provides U.S. examples, and focuses on activities intended to inform the
public during emergencies.
EPPR Mapping Projects
Two projects were
proposed at the EPPR Working Group meeting in April 2004. Based on discussions
during the meeting, it was agreed to work towards combining the two projects,
and possibly others within the Arctic Council. Once the pilot studies and any
workshops have been completed, recommendations will be made concerning future
directions for mapping within the EPPR Working Group. For the time being, the
two projects are presented separately.
1. Interactive Maps
and Environmental Information from Arctic Council Programmes on the Web
Region: Circumpolar
Project Period: 2004 2005
Funding: Norway, Canada, Finland, Russian Federation, Sweden, US, AMAP
Secretariat, GRID Arendal
Local Counterparts: Norway Norwegian Coastal Administration, Norwegian
Radiation Protection Authority; AMAP Secretariat; GRID Arendal; US - Office
of International Emergency Management and Cooperation, National Nuclear
Security Administration, Department of Energy
Brief: The EPPR Working Group (lead Norway) is moving forward on a pilot
study with GRID Arendal and the AMAP Secretariat to develop an interactive
web-based map series based on the completed EPPR product, ‘Circumpolar Map of
Resources at Risk from Oil Spills in the Arctic’. The Circumpolar Map
consists of static maps which are available on CD or the web site it is not
interactive and does not include all the data collected. The current proposal
involves a shared Arctic Council web server where each group could have its
own web site but still use the data of other groups. Based on the results of
this pilot study, a workshop will be held and recommendations made at the
next EPPR meeting in 2005.
2. Radioactivity in
the Arctic Map and Information
Region: Circumpolar
Project Period: 2004 2005
Funding: US, Canada, Finland, Norway, Russian Federation and Sweden
Brief: The Working Group will develop a map to provide a full picture of the
information on radioactive sites in the Arctic. The map would link to data on
the status of all sources of radioactivity. The EPPR lead (Norway) for the circumpolar map and the AMAP Secretariat will conduct a pilot project to
make an interactive web-based map that will include the AMAP data on
radioactivity sources. A path forward will be determined based on comments
received on the pilot project.
Arctic
Rescue
Region: Russian Federation, with possible expansion to include countries in the circumpolar Arctic
Project Period: 2004 ongoing
Funding: to be determined
Local Counterparts: EMERCOM of Russia
Brief: Arctic
Rescue is a mechanism for the prevention and response to emergencies in
the Arctic. The first step would be to establish a coordination centre in Moscow and a network of points with suitable infrastructure (airport, seaport, roads,
medical services, etc.). Three stations are proposed for the Russian Federation (Murmansk, Dikson, and Chukotka). The Russian Federation has invited other
interested countries to identify potential sites for inclusion in a network.
The project to develop international nuclear emergency response capabilities
(see below) is seen as an example of a building block for the Arctic Rescue
initiative.
Arctic
Guide
Region: Circumpolar
Project Period: Ongoing/Updated annually
Funding: EPPR Secretariat
Local Counterparts: not applicable
Brief: The on-line Arctic
Guide provides information on how the emergency systems work in each
Arctic country, contact points and notification numbers. The Guide also
provides a brief overview of the risks in the Arctic and on a
country-by-country basis, and summarizes applicable international,
multi-lateral and bi-lateral agreements.
Updating
the Environmental Risk Assessment
Region: Circumpolar
Project Period: 2004 2006
Project Funding: Secretariat and member Countries
Local Counterparts:
existing environmental risk assessments
Brief: At their meeting in November 2004, the Ministers accepted the recommendation
that natural disasters be added to the mandate of EPPR. The Working Group
will provide information in response to the SAO Chair’s request for further
information regarding the implications of the proposed expansion of the
mandate. The first steps will include: updating the environmental risk
assessment matrix to include natural disasters (information on other hazards
will also be reviewed); exchange of information; and clarification of the
specific goals related natural disasters. Once the role of EPPR in meeting
the needs arising during natural disasters is clarified, specific projects
will be proposed. Initial projects could include a review of response
programs or workshops on best practices.
Cooperation
with Other Organizations
Region: Circumpolar
Project Period: Ongoing
Funding: Country funding for their own participation
Brief: The EPPR Working Group cooperates on projects and information sharing
related to emergency prevention, preparedness and response with other Arctic
Council working groups and organizations such as the Northern Forum. Current
initiatives include the following.
1. Developing
International Nuclear Emergency Response Capabilities
The International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is fostering development of international
response capabilities to address ‘nuclear events’, including small
radiological incidents, Called National Assistance Capabilities, these assets
can be used to respond to events at home or abroad, either through deployment
of resources, or “home-based” support, such as analysis of monitoring data.
EPPR member countries have been invited to help shape the Arctic component of
this ongoing project via the development of a nuclear response component of
the Arctic Rescue initiative.
2. Table Top
Emergency Exercises
The Arctic Military
Environmental Cooperation (AMEC) partners will conduct a tabletop emergency
exercise involving the transport of radioactive material in the Murmansk region, in 2005;
EPPR member countries are invited to participate. The scenario
has not yet been finalized.
Several other table top exercises are planned where EPPR member countries are
invited to participate or observe, including:
- The
Barents - Euro Arctic Council Barents Rescue 2005 exercise (terrorism,
SAR and oil spill)
- The
US-led biennial ‘Spill of National Significance’ exercise.
3. Cooperation with
Northern Forum
The EPPR prepared an
updated report (March 2004) on potential cooperation with the Northern Forum,
specifically the EPPR response to the recommendations from the Northern Forum’s
April 2002 Severe Cold Climate Emergency Response Workshop. The Northern
Forum has confirmed their interest and support to undertake work on 4 of the
8 recommendations with respect to oil spills. The Working Group will continue
to cooperate with the Northern Forum on activities that support the EPPR
agenda, particularly in light of the recent inclusion of natural disasters in
the EPPR mandate.
|